Society for the Study of Social Problems Sociology and Social Welfare Division Spring 2015 In this issue: Messages from the Outgoing and Incoming Division Chairs 2015 Conference Paper Sessions Graduate Student Paper Winner 2015 Conference Events JSSW Special Issue Calls for Papers Interesting Findings Book Review Newsletter Editor: Kattalina Berriochoa, University of Massachusetts, Boston Message from the Division Chair Greetings to members and friends of the Sociology and Social Welfare Division of SSSP! Hope your spring semesters have come (or are coming) to a good close and that you are looking forward the SSSP summer conference August 21-23, 2015 at the Radisson Blu Aqua Hotel in Chicago, IL. This year's conference theme "Removing the Mask, Lifting the Veil: Race, Class, and Gender in the 21st Century" promises to spark many interesting conversations about our scholarship as well as current events. As this is my last newsletter as SSW Division Chair, I'd like to thank a few people who have been really helpful along the way. First, thank you to Kattalina Berriochoa and Karen Monaghan, Public Policy doctoral students at UMass Boston who have served as the current and former newsletter editors. I deeply appreciate their assistance in pulling together four division newsletters. Second, thank you to division members who have served on division committees in the past two years: Richard Captuo, Sandra Fogel, Kasey Hendricks, Linda Houser, and Keith Kilty. Your service is an important part of achieving the work of the division. Finally, I would like to introduce Linda Houser (Widener University), our new SSW Division Chair. You can see Linda's note below. Thank you to Linda for taking on this exciting role. Please join me in working with her over the next couple years to continue to strengthen our division!I look forward to continued membership and involvement in Sociology and Social Welfare Division and SSSP! Sincerely yours, Heather MacIndoe, UMass Boston As I begin my term as Division Chair following this summer’s annual meeting, I am looking forward to engaging with you, both as individuals and as a group, to support the scholarship, service, and practice of the division and SSSP. Heather MacIndoe’s leadership has made my involvement in the division a pleasure and source of great professional satisfaction, and I hope to continue in her path. My research to date has covered a number of content areas including state-level employment policies, work-family integration in families affected by autism, the role of child care subsidies in welfare-to-work programs, and the relationship between food stamp receipt and health outcomes. My current research engages several related areas: perceptions of care quality among consumers of attendant care services, the employment experiences of women with breast cancer and their access to family and medical leave, and the relationship between employment leave access and use and maternal and infant health. I am an Associate Professor in the Center for Social Work Education at Widener University, and I direct our Ph.D. program in Social Work. The rapid approach of the spring graduation reminds me both of how many papers I have yet to grade and how fortunate I am to intersect with such engaging and engaged students. I hope to see many familiar and new faces at the division meeting in August. Please do not hesitate to email me with questions, concerns, and updates. I am excited to begin this new role. --- Linda 2015 Sociology and Social Welfare Paper Sessions Session 7: Nonprofits and the Welfare State Date: Friday, August 21 Time: 8:30 AM - 10:10 AM Room: Aegean Organizer, Presider & Discussant: Heather MacIndoe, University of Massachusetts Session 29: The Impact of Social Welfare Policy on Race, Class, and Gender Disparities Date: Friday, August 21 Time: 12:30 PM - 2:10 PM Room: Bering Organizer & Presider: Joyce Bialik, Touro College Graduate School of Social Work Session 42: Conflict and Social Welfare in the 21st Century: Neighborhoods, Cities, & Nations Date: Friday, August 21 Time: 2:30 PM - 4:10 PM Room: Pacific 1 Organizer & Presider: Alissa Klein, University of South Florida Session 61: Contemporary Welfare Developments in a Neoliberal Era: Building Danish-US Research Ties Date: Saturday, August 22 Time: 8:30 AM - 10:10 AM Room: Bering Organizers & Presiders: R.A. Dello Buono, Manhattan College & Mia Arp Fallov, Aalborg University Session 78: Homelessness in the U.S. Date: Saturday, August 22 Time: 10:30 AM - 12:10 PM Room: Pacific 3 Organizer, Presider & Discussant: Beth Frankel Merenstein, Central Connecticut State University Session 92: Chicago/Regional Spotlight: The Plight of the Urban Metropolis in the Midwest Date: Saturday, August 22 Time: 12:30 PM - 2:10 PM Room: Caspian Organizer: Kasey Henricks, American Bar Foundation and Loyola University, Chicago Presider & Discussant: Louise Seamster, Duke University Session 95: Personal, Institutional, & Professional Resistance: Gender, Race, & Poverty Date: Saturday, August 22 Time: 12:30 PM - 2:10 PM Room: Pacific 3 Organizer: Sobia Shaheen Shaikh, School of Social Work, Memorial University Presiders: Elizabeth Brule, York University & Sobia Shaheen Shaikh, Memorial University Session 102: Social & Contextual Determinants of Health Care Access, Utilization, & Outcomes Date: Saturday, August 22 Time: 2:30 PM - 4:10 PM Room: Baltic Organizer & Presider: Shannon Monnat, Penn State University Session 117: The Changing Nature of the Welfare State: Race, Class, and Gender Date: Sunday, August 23 Time: 8:30 AM - 10:10 AM Room: Atlantic E Organizer & Presider: Linda Houser, Widener University Session 169: Social Welfare and Well-being Date: Sunday, August 23 Time: 4:30 PM - 6:10 PM Room: Atlantic D Organizer & Presider: Matthew P. Eddy, Minot State University Graduate Student Paper Winner Voluntary Child Welfare Workers’ Perception of the Profession: Workers' Experiences with Psychological Climate and Implications for Job Satisfaction Allison Houston & Anne-Marie Gomes State University of New York at Albany Abstract: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between psychological climate, embedded in Parker’s psychological climate scale, and job satisfaction as applied to workers in voluntary child welfare agencies. Cross-sectional data from thirteen non-profit agencies that were collected between 2009 and 2012 were used. Regression equations were calculated using ordinary least squares in which overall satisfaction scores were the dependent variables and overall psychological climate was the main independent variable. Analysis of two-way interactions between climate and workers’ perception of child welfare work on job satisfaction was also considered. Results show psychological climate positively impacted child welfare workers’ satisfaction with their job. Annual salary and job type hold significant explanatory power among child welfare workers. Low salary was inversely related to satisfaction, workers identified as educators were less satisfied than direct child care workers, clinical social workers, and administrators. Workers’ perception of child welfare work moderates the association between organizational climate and job satisfaction. Results highlight the need to examine more fully the impact of climate on disparities in job satisfaction derived from employees’ job type and salaries. Investigations of other contextual factors that might moderate the effects of psychological climate perception on job satisfaction are also needed. 2015 Conference Events Sociology & Social Welfare Division Business Meeting Saturday, August 21, 4:30-6:10pm Room: Atlantic C Please come and meet Linda Houser, the new SSW Division Chair, meet other division members, and volunteer to get more involved in the division. SSSP Awards Ceremony Saturday, August 22, from 6:30-7:15pm The Division-Sponsored Reception Saturday, August 22, from 7:15pm-8:15pm Special Issue Calls for Papers The Basic Income Guarantee (BIG) Guest Editors: Michael A. Lewis, Ph.D., The Silberman School of Social Work Hunter College & Richard K. Caputo, Ph.D., Wurzweiler School of Social Work, Yeshiva University The financial crisis of 2007-2008 and its recessionary aftermath have, once again, raised the issue of whether a market economy can be relied upon to assure economic security. Although the market economy is dynamic and quite productive, the financial crisis has highlighted its instability and tendency to produce high unemployment, low wages, stagnant wages, greater income inequality or a combination. Many would argue that the social welfare system, with its myriad of safety net programs, is intended to address such conditions. Yet it has holes that have allowed many to still live in poverty, many more to live with a very realistic fear of falling into poverty, and an erosion of the middle class. This instability and tendency toward low wages, stagnant wages for middle class families, or no employment in a market economy, coupled with a social safety net system riddled with holes, suggests that it is time to think about new approaches to income and wealth distribution, not only for purposes of poverty prevention or even poverty reduction, but also for social justice. Are there fairer and more efficient ways to distribute the fruits of our individual and collective efforts to everyone’s benefit? One such program is the basic income guarantee (BIG), also called the guaranteed income. The idea is simple: replace most income support programs with a floor under everyone’s income, structured so that no one is in poverty and everyone is better off financially if they earn more in the private market. We’re issuing a call for papers for a special issue of the Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare (JSSW) to explore the merits of BIG and related proposals such as guaranteed jobs, stakeholder grants, asset accumulation policies, and living wage legislation. We’re interested in proposals related to BIG because some have argued that the goals of BIG could be better realized by other approaches, such as government guaranteeing a job instead of an income. The special issue is intended to consider the economic, social, political, and philosophical questions about BIG and related policies. The papers will be written by social workers and academics in related disciplines. The special issue is intended to explore some of the following Topics: BIG, other related programs, and social justice BIG, other programs, and gender relations Financing BIG and related programs BIG, other programs, and the labor Market BIG, related programs, and civic engagement BIG, related programs, and the bargaining power of workers BIG, related programs, and the family The political feasibility of BIG and related programs We invite authors to submit manuscripts not to exceed thirty double-spaced (12-pitch font) pages (including references) on any of the topics above as well as related topics. Please send MS Word manuscripts that adhere to the APA Manual, 6th edition style, electronically, as email attachments to: Michael A. Lewis, Professor, michael.a.lewis@hunter.cuny.edu. Manuscripts received by September 30, 2015 will be considered by a special issue of JSSW with an anticipated publication date in June or September 2016. Mind-Body Interventions in Social Work Guest Editors: Yvonne A. Unrau, Ph.D. and Melinda McCormick, M.S.W. Western Michigan University School of Social Work The Journal of the Sociology and Social Welfare (JSSW) announces a special issue dedicated to studies of mind-body interventions as applied to social problems to prevent adversity and promote wholeness and well-being among individuals, groups, organizations, or communities served by the social work profession. Mind-body interventions include a diverse group of practices such as controlled breathing practices, meditation, yoga and practices associated with spirituality; and are considered one domain of practice of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM). In this special issue, we explore usefulness and effectiveness of mind-body interventions as applied to groups of marginalized individuals in society including but not limited to individuals living with conditions of homelessness, mental illness, domestic violence, child abuse and neglect, poverty, incarceration and discrimination based on race or gender-identity orientation. While all high-quality manuscripts focused on mind-body intervention research will be considered, we are particularly interested in papers that describe methods and key findings of mind-body intervention studies and discuss applications to social service practice and/or public policy. In addition, we are seeking papers that will contribute to scholarly contemplation regarding the use of mind-body approaches in the social welfare field to address issues of transformative healing and change among populations and communities marginalized by oppressive social conditions such as poverty, discrimination and violence. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to, the following: completed efficacy studies that determine the specific effects of a mind-body intervention using experimental methods; completed outcomes, effectiveness and case studies that investigate the feasibility and usefulness in general populations or settings; systematic methods to develop/adapt existing mind-body interventions to new populations or settings; studies of implementation of mind-body interventions in community settings; methodological research on mind-body interventions, including advances in methods for measuring and analyzing fidelity and dosage data in community settings. Authors are invited to contact the guest editors to discuss ideas for submissions: yvonne.unrau@wmich.edu and melinda.m.mccormick@wmich.edu. Submission Process We invite authors to submit manuscripts not to exceed thirty double-spaced (12-pitch font) pages (including references and tables) on any of the topics above as well as related topics. Manuscripts received by August 8, 2015 will be considered by a special issue of JSSW with an anticipated publication date in 2016. Please send MS Word manuscripts that adhere to the APA Manual, 6th edition style, electronically, as email attachments to: melinda.m.mccormick@wmich.edu. Manuscript Submission Deadline: August 8, 2015. Interesting Findings To what extent are children’s opportunities for upward economic mobility shaped by the neighborhoods in which they grow up? Researchers Raj Chetty and Nathaniel Hendren of Harvard University studied this question using data from more than five million children whose families moved across counties between 1996 and 2012. Their findings, which highlight the importance of place in determining an escape from poverty, effectively overturning those of Moving to Opportunity. Read the New York Times coverage here: http://nyti.ms/1DYMuOI. Book Review Pop Culture Freaks: Identity, Mass Media, and Society by Dustin Kidd Reviewed by Nia Reed, Sociology Department, Georgia State University Dustin Kidd offers an enlightening, informal analysis of how U.S. popular culture informs nearly every aspect of the lives of those who are plugged into various mass media outlets. Students will appreciate the effort taken to provide a laymen’s (though scholarly) account of often complex economic, psychological, and sociological ideologies and concepts. Using major pop culture artifacts, such as the Matrix and Harry Potter series, the author illuminates the relationships between mass media and race, class, gender, ableism, sexuality, and body image (as well as intersections of the like). Kidd transforms “freak” from a derogatory term to a celebration of anyone or any group who defies racial, class, gender, disability, and heteronormative standards and hierarchies set by mass media and corporate matrices. This is done by identifying the privileges and oppressions of the Matrix (Kidd highlights current ideologies of social illusions and truths, just as the main character, Neo, had to address in the 1999 blockbuster film, the Matrix). Society operates within a commercial culture system that treat most of its members as outsiders, or freaks. Kidd acknowledges the unrealistic standards set for individuals by the mass media, and invites readers to embrace their “freak” status, as being a “freak” is essentially a collective identity that is shared by most, and only a few are the exception. Throughout the book, Dustin Kidd references past scholars and their work like Patricia Hill Collins (1990, Black Feminist Thought-how black women are portrayed), Emile Durkheim (1951, Suicide: A Study in Sociology-suicide as more of a social than psychological issue), Michel Foucault (1976, The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction-sexuality and the power heteronormative power hierarchy), and many more (i.e., Judith Butler, Georg Simmel, etc.). Kidd successfully applies each of these concepts to the “freak” theme, positing that these theorists explain how race, class, gender, sexuality, and ableism (and their intersects) allow most of society to be categorized as “freaks,” but how the mass media will have the masses believe that the exceptional few are the norm. To add even more contextual support, the author provides a brief, but efficient look at the historical context of various mass media faculties (see Appendix 1 for Printing and Publishing; see Appendix 2 for the Music Industry; see Appendix 3 for Film, see Appendix 4 for Television; see Appendix 5 for the Internet). The Matrix analogies successfully addresses the perils of consistent exposure to mass media (while plugged in), and Harry Potter addresses more mainstream, structural social problems, like race, class, and gender disparities. There are however, minimal flaws in Kidd’s book. It may prove difficult for students to relate to some of the outdated analogies that are used throughout the book. The Matrix, for example, was a blockbuster film that many have heard of, even if they have not watched it, however, the theme of the Matrix loses its popular, relevant status with the passing of time, as it was released more than 15 years ago. Furthermore, dated sitcoms and songs were used to demonstrate race, gender, sexuality, and disability inequalities, potentially losing student readers to time stamped examples. Admittedly, this argument does not hold true for the Harry Potter series, as it is more recent and more of a global phenomenon than the Matrix, allowing for greater connectivity to the material, for students. In addition, Dustin Kidd occasionally introduces concepts or terms without providing clarity, or concrete definitions (i.e. glocalization). Despite minor aforementioned issues, I recommend this book (paired with a reader) for sociology, film, psychology, history, or multicultural diversity courses. The author discusses structural, financial, social, and systemic practices of mass media corporations and how those practices exacerbate longstanding social problems, and how they create new ones. Furthermore, Kidd illustrates how film, television, the music industry, and the Internet have distinct patterns of inequalities towards various groups (LGBTQ, minorities, disabled, etc.). Finally, scholars and students alike can gain useful insight into the biopsychosocial impact of pop culture (via mass media outlets) on society. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2014, 288 pp., ISBN: 978-0-813-34912-1. $35.00 Sociology and Social Welfare Division Incoming Division Chair Linda Houser, Widener University houser.linda@gmail.com 2013-15 Division Chair Heather MacIndoe, UMass Boston Heather.MacIndoe@umb.edu About the Sociology and Social Welfare Division: The SSWD Division's mission is to provide opportunities for scholars, researchers, students, activists, and others to share and discuss their scholarship and experiences in a supportive setting. In order to further the goal of a just world, the Division seeks to integrate theory, empirical findings, and practice of both researchers and grassroots activists. Sociology and Social Welfare Division Heather MacIndoe SSW Division Chair, University of Massachusetts, Boston Phone: 617-287-4861 E-Mail: Heather.MacIndoe@umb.edu. We’re on the Web! Visit us at: http://www.sssp1.org