2013 Proposed Resolutions
Compiled by Tracy L. Dietz (SSSP Vice President)
Resolution 1: "Call for SSSP to Oppose the National Movement to Impose Austerity on Public Higher Education and Support the Resistance of CUNY’s Faculty to Pathways, A Diminished, Austerity Curriculum" Submitted by Eileen Moran and Barbara Katz Rothman
Resolution 2: "Resolution Expressing Concern that Portions of the USA Patriot and Homeland Securities Acts Pose a Direct Threat to the Liberties and Civil Rights Protected by the United States Constitution and the Human Rights Protected by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights" Submitted by Luis Esparza
Resolution 3: "Racial Disparities in Drug Law Enforcement" Submitted by Joyce Bialik and Heather MacIndoe on behalf of the Social Welfare Division
Resolution 4: "School to Prison Pipeline, Affecting Low Income Students of Color, Especially Black Males" Submitted by Joyce Bialik and Heather MacIndoe on behalf of the Social Welfare Division
Resolution 5: "Expression of Gratitude"
Click here for a PDF version of the 2013 Proposed Resolutions.
RESOLUTION 1: Call for SSSP to Oppose the National Movement to Impose Austerity on Public Higher Education and Support the Resistance of CUNY’s Faculty to Pathways, A Diminished, Austerity Curriculum
Submitted by Eileen Moran and Barbara Katz Rothman
Whereas, Pathways, a top down revamping of CUNY’s core curriculum, undermines both faculty governance and the quality of the education CUNY’s 400,000 students will receive; and
Whereas, the CUNY administrators and Board of Trustees bypassed CUNY’s Faculty Senates, the elected bodies charged with curriculum development, to impose Pathways in September of 2013 over the strong objection of these faculty bodies; and
Whereas, after years of declining public investment and growing enrollments, CUNY is pressed to graduate more students faster, to reduce costs and increase productivity, thus to impose an austerity education; and
Whereas, the college completion agenda is part of a national movement to corporatize and ration public higher education; and
Whereas, curricula comparable to Pathways, some even called Pathways, have already been implemented or proposed at other public colleges and universities (1); and
Whereas, well financed foundations, particularly the Lumina Foundation, are in the forefront of imposing austerity nationally, by lobbying public university Boards of Trustees as change agents (2); and
Whereas, the conservative American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) also has an agenda for higher education that furthers austerity by tying public funding to outcomes, including testing, graduation rates and employment after graduation;(3) and
Whereas, fourteen states have already passed legislation to implement ALEC’s accountability measures, and Governor Cuomo has attempted to include such measures in his 2014 budget proposal in NYS (4); and
Whereas, under the guise of facilitating student transfers at CUNY, Pathways, with its three credit limits, offers diluted classes and reduced requirements such as basic science courses without laboratory hours and eliminates four-credit language and English composition courses, and
Whereas, austerity higher education seriously undermines the prospects of poor, working class, older adult students and students of color who are most likely to attend public institutions; and
Whereas, states’ disinvestment in public higher education has already reshaped public higher education policy, beginning with the presidents who have prioritized workforce development and accountability while paying only lip service to former goals of affordability and access; and
Whereas, in a confidential referendum, sponsored by the Professional Staff Congress, CUNY’s faculty-staff union, 92% of faculty participants voted no confidence in Pathways; and
Whereas, public higher education’s mission to develop students’ critical thinking in order to promote participation in a democratic, diverse society is undermined by austerity measures; therefore
Be it resolved, that the Society for the Study of Social Problems communicate to CUNY’s Acting Chancellor William Kelly and to CUNY’s Board of Trustees its support for academic freedom and faculty governance at CUNY, and its support of the faculty’s demand for a moratorium on Pathways; and
Be it Further Resolved, that SSSP communicate its opposition to the imposition of Pathways and austerity education to the NYC media and the national media addressing higher education issues (NYT, Daily News, Wall St. Journal, CHE, Inside Higher Education, and others); and
Be it Further Resolved, that SSSP provide information to its members on its website about this national movement to impose austerity higher education; and
Be it Further Resolved, that going forward SSSP make its opposition to the austerity agenda being advanced and support its members, confronting and resisting such processes on other campuses.
Notes
- A Google search of Pathways and higher education curriculum produces pages of citations including Colorado’s Pathways curriculum, SAS an online resource for K-16 and a mix of scholarly critiques as well as global patterns in higher education.
- See Lumina foundation at www.luminafoundation.org and Jamie P. Merisotis, President and CEO of Lumina Foundation keynote address to The Pennsylvania Association of Councils of Trustees (PACT), Harrisburg, PA, April 16, 2013.
- See www.alec.org “Ten Questions Legislators Should Ask About Higher Education”. Fourteen states currently tie funding to performance and many more require an assortment of measures of student engagement, efficacy or productivity.
- In the budget for 2013-14 Governor Cuomo included funding tied to outcomes, but it was modified by the legislature due to the efforts of the PSC and other union affiliates of New York State United Teachers.
RESOLUTION 2: Resolution Expressing Concern that Portions of the USA Patriot and Homeland Securities Acts Pose a Direct Threat to the Liberties and Civil Rights Protected by the United States Constitution and the Human Rights Protected by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Submitted by Luis Esparza
Whereas the laws of the United States of America permit for the free exercise and enjoyment of the unalienable rights endowed to all, as so expressed in the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights; and
Whereas the Society for the Study of Social Problems is composed of an international membership of practitioners and scholars of many different nationalities, ethnicities, races, religious affiliations, sexualities, and genders protected under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; and
Whereas the Society for the Study of Social Problems recognizes the importance of not infringing on the human or constitutionality guaranteed rights of any person; and
Whereas the Society for the Study of Social Problems recognizes that a well-informed public is essential to the protection of the laws of the United States of America; and
Whereas the Patriot Act expanded the circumstances in which law enforcement agencies could search homes and offices without notifying the owner prior to the search; and
Whereas the Patriot Act, with collaboration from service providers, allows law enforcement to monitor any computer without the knowledge of the owner, without the need to get a warrant and without the need to show probable cause, and;
Whereas the National Security Agency of the United States of America is intercepting the Internet communications of millions of US citizens via the government program known as codename PRISM; and
Whereas certain provisions of the USA Patriot and the Homeland Security Acts, expand the power of the Federal Government to detain and investigate, engage in covert electronic surveillance and search and seize real and personal property, bank accounts, records and information, without establishing reasonable suspicion or probable cause; and
Whereas the US government has captured and tortured dozens of individuals under the authority of Homeland Security laws; and
Whereas the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court has rejected only 0.03% of all surveillance requests from the Federal Bureau of Investigation; and
Whereas the kind of covert surveillance that the Patriot Act and Homeland Security Acts extend to the Federal Bureau of Investigation denies a person the opportunity and right to take legal action against the government or other parties for violations of rights, in such manner as to threaten the lives, liberties and civil rights of citizens and non-citizens guaranteed under the United States Constitution; and
Whereas the Executive Branch of the Federal government has consistently denied the requests of members of Congress for increased transparency of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court; and
Whereas the Patriot Act permits the Federal Bureau of Investigation, under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, to compel the production of records, including library and medical records, from any business regarding any person, even if that person is not the target of an investigation, is not suspected of wrongdoing, and without having to show that the information is relevant to an investigation only by claiming that the information is sought in connection with an investigation of terrorism or espionage;
Now therefore be it resolved that the Society for the Study of Social Problems believes that the Patriot Act of 2001 does not allow for sufficient regulation and transparent oversight of Executive authority and should be immediately repealed; and
Be it further resolved that the Society for the Study of Social Problems directs its Executive Officer to transmit to the Sociologists Without Borders membership, immediately, any information obtained to the USA Patriot and Homeland Securities Acts; and
Be it further resolved that the Society for the Study of Social Problems expresses concern that portions of the USA Patriot and Homeland Securities Acts pose a direct threat to the human rights protected by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; and
Be it further resolved that the Society for the Study of Social Problems joins organizations and communities across the United States and the world expressing concern that portions of the USA Patriot and Homeland Securities Acts pose a direct threat to the liberties and civil rights protected by the United States Constitution; and
Be it further resolved that the Society for the Study of Social Problems believes that the United States government is in violation of Article 5 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which prevents torture as well as “cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment;” and
Be it further resolved that the Society for the Study of Social Problems believes that the United States government is in violation of Article 10 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights which states that “Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him;” and
Be it further resolved that the Society for the Study of Social Problems believes that the United States government is in violation of Article 12 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which states that “No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence;” and
Be it further resolved that the Society for the Study of Social Problems believes that the United States government is in violation of Article 14 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which states that “Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in other countries asylum from persecution;" and
Be it further resolved that the Society for the Study of Social Problems believes that the United States Executive branch may be in violation of the 4th Amendment of the US Constitution of the United States of America, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures and sets out requirements for search warrants based on probable cause; and
Be it further resolved that the Society for the Study of Social Problems believes that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court summaries currently provided to certain members of the United States Congress do not provide sufficient details regarding extant government surveillance programs so as to provide for adequate oversight; and
Be it further resolved that the Society for the Study of Social Problems asks that the Executive branch immediately and permanently suspend the government surveillance program, codename “PRISM;” and
Be it further resolved that the Society for the Study of Social Problems asks that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court comply with all requests for information provided to them by the congressional committee on security; and
Be it finally resolved that a copy of this resolution be presented to affiliated scientific associations and civil rights bodies, the President and Attorney General of the United States of America, the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, and that US citizens remind their congressional representatives, through non-violent methods, of their commitment to abide by the Constitution and repeal those sections of the USA Patriot and Homeland Security Acts which violate the People's liberties and civil rights.
RESOLUTION 3: Racial Disparities in Drug Law Enforcement
Submitted by Joyce Bialik and Heather MacIndoe on behalf of the Social Welfare Division
Whereas racial disparities in incarceration have been documented for decades, the most problematic being for Black men currently imprisoned 6.4 times the rate of White men;
Whereas drug offending and discriminatory police and sentencing practices have been major factors in this racial disparity, while particular issues in New York City and State are police-stop-and-frisk practices and a loophole in state law that in 1977 decriminalized possession of marijuana;
Whereas this loophole criminalizes possession when marijuana is “open to public view." When someone complies with a police officer’s directive to “empty your pockets,” during a stop-and-frisk encounter (even though one is not legally required to do so), the individual is then charged with the crime of possessing marijuana “open to public view;”
Whereas because of this loophole and police stop-and-frisk practices more than 600,000 New Yorkers have been arrested for marijuana possession since 1996, including more than 45,000 people in 2012 alone;
Whereas these arrests predominantly affect young people with no prior criminal involvement;
Whereas more than 84 percent of those arrested for possession were people of color – even though young whites use marijuana at higher rates;
Whereas these arrests and imprisonments have significant consequences, such as creating barriers to employment, financial aid, and housing; and
Whereas these arrests cost NYC taxpayers $75 million last year and over $600 million dollars during the last decade;
Whereas NYC’s Mayor Bloomberg, NYC Police Commissioner Ray Kelly, and all five NY District Attorneys have supported legislation to fix the marijuana possession laws;
Be it resolved that Society for the Study of Social Problems (SSSP) opposes the practice of “stop, question, and frisk” which affects more than a half a million New Yorkers each year and unfairly targets Black and Latino youth;
And it be further resolved that SSSP supports the Community Safety Act, a police reform legislative package aimed at ending discriminatory policing and bringing accountability to the NYC Police Department;
And be it further resolved that SSSP supports efforts to standardize the penalties for possessing a small amount of marijuana in New York so that possession in public view would be a violation punishable by a summons and fine, not arrest and jail;
And be it further resolved that a copy of this resolution with a cover letter be forwarded to the governor, legislative leaders in Albany, the Mayor of NYC, and members of the NYC Council and any other individual or body that the Executive Officer of the SSSP determine.
Resources
Communities United Police Reform. Community Safety Act. http://changethenypd.org/community-safety-act
Drug Policy Alliance. Ending the Marijuana Arrest Crusade in NYC. http://www.drugpolicy.org/departments-and-state-offices/new-york/ending-marijuana-arrest-crusade-nyc
Goode, E. (February, 2013). Incarceration rates for Blacks have fallen sharply, report shows. The New York Times.
Harcourt, B.E. and Ludwig, J. (2007). “Reefer Madness: Broken Windows Policing and Misdemeanor Marijuana Arrests in New York City, 1989-2000,” Criminology and Public Policy 6:1 pp. 165-182.
Levine, H and Peterson Small, D. (2008). Marijuana Arrest Crusade: Racial Bias and Police Policy in New York City, 1997 – 2007, (New York: New York Civil Liberties Union), pp 38 – 45.
Levine, H.G. and Siegel, L. (2011). $75 Million A Year, New York: Drug Policy Alliance.
Marihuana Reform Act of 1977, Public Law 360, 1977-1978 Legislature, Regular Session (29 June 1977).
New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, Adult Arrests in 2012, Computerized Criminal History System, February 2013.
New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services. (February 2013). New York City Arrests for PL 221.10 in 2012, Computerized Criminal History System.
Ruderman, W. (8 February 2013). “Number of Frisks Fell in ’12, Police Data Show.” The New York Times. <http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/09/nyregion/number-of-frisks-fell-in-12-police-data-show.html>;
U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (2008). 2007 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, Washington D.C.: United States Government Office of Applied Studies.
RESOLUTION 4: School to Prison Pipeline, Affecting Low Income Students of Color, Especially Black Males
Submitted by Joyce Bialik and Heather MacIndoe on behalf of the Social Welfare Division
Whereas more than one-half of Black men in low-income urban areas do not finish high school, which studies show greatly increases their risk of incarceration;
Whereas by the end of the 1990s a Black male high school dropout, born 1965-69, had nearly a 60 percent chance of serving time in prison;
Whereas research shows that current school discipline policies which rely on suspensions, widespread police presence, and other punitive practices do not reduce conflict, and instead increase the likelihood that students will fall behind, drop out and/or become incarcerated;
Whereas punitive policies disproportionately affect low-income students of color and students with disabilities, with Black male students impacted more than any other group;
Whereas these practices have a negative impact on school climate by undermining positive relationships between students and trusted adults and contributing to conflict on school campuses;
Be it resolved that the Society for the Study of Social Problems (SSSP) calls for New York City to support reducing suspensions and school-based arrests and implementing positive alternatives to protect students’ human rights to education and dignity;
Be it further resolved that SSSP supports the creation of safe and supportive school climates in all New York City public schools without the need for school police or metal detectors, where young people are not suspended and removed from class, and where teachers and students have training and support to prevent and resolve conflicts in positive ways;
Be it further resolved that SSSP calls on the Mayor, the New York City Department of Education, the New York State Education Department, and City and State legislators to:
1. Implement and fund positive school-wide discipline policies in all schools by incorporating approaches such as restorative practices, Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS), and peer mediation.
2. Begin implementation in the highest need schools by providing resources, training and technical assistance for schools. Highest need schools include schools that are heavily policed, schools with metal detectors, cameras, and large numbers of School Safety Officers, schools with high suspension, expulsion, and arrest rates, schools with a population of students at risk of dropping out, and Impact Schools. They also include schools in low income communities of color, where we see a correlation between the criminalization of students inside and outside of schools.
3. Fund, designate, and train a staff person in each school, beginning with the highest need schools, to serve as a Restorative Discipline Coordinator who will help develop and oversee implementation of a school-wide plan, and provide ongoing support and coordination for teachers and students.
4. Require training for all teachers, principals, counselors, school aides, and other support staff on how to implement positive interventions, and engage students, parents, and educators to help design and lead the trainings.
5. Consult regularly with students, parents, and other community members about the development of school discipline, climate, and safety practices to involve the entire school community.
6. Create and train a Restorative Discipline Team at the NYC Department of Education to ensure that schools are implementing and sustaining positive school-wide discipline policies, and to provide technical assistance and support.
7. Reduce suspensions by no less than 50% by the 2013 – 2014 school year, eliminate suspensions of more than 10 days, and reduce school-based arrests by revising the Discipline Code, Chancellor’s Regulations, and other policies.
8. Require the use of positive interventions, such as mediation, counseling, restorative circles, or fairness committees, instead of suspensions except where suspensions are required by law.
9. Adopt a policy that schools must take certain steps before they can suspend a student, such as using positive interventions, or meeting with the student and/or the student’s guardian to discuss disciplinary options.
10. When a student returns from a suspension, require that schools provide academic support and implement positive interventions to reintegrate the student into the school community.
11. Require schools to strictly uphold students’ due process rights and provide remedies for violations of those rights.
12. Decriminalize students by minimizing police presence and arrests, eliminating use of metal detectors in schools, and giving schools control over school safety.
13. Monitor the use of suspensions, removals, arrests, and positive interventions in all schools.
14. Hold schools accountable for reducing high suspension and arrest rates, not through punitive measures, but by providing technical assistance and support to implement positive approaches.
15. Ensure that schools do not use suspensions in cases prohibited by the Discipline Code, such as wearing a hat and other infractions under Level 1 of the Discipline Code.
Be it further resolved that a copy of this resolution and cover letter shall be forwarded to the Mayor, the New York City Department of Education, the New York State Education Department, and City and State legislators
References
Advancement Project. (2010). Test, punish, and push out: how 'zero tolerance' and high-stakes testing funnel youth into the School-to-Prison Pipeline. Advancement Project, 14.
Delgado, Héctor L., (2013) Social Problems Forum: The SSSP Newsletter, retrieved from http://www.sssp1.org/file/Newsletters/SP_Forum/Winter%202013%20Newsletter.pdf.
Eckholm, E. (2006, March 20). Plight deepens for Black men, studies warn. The New York Times. Retrieved June 14, 2013 from http://www.uri.edu/artsci/ecn/starkey/ECN386%20-Race,Gender,%20Class/blackmen_plightof.pdf
Pettit, B. & Western, B. Pettit, B & Western, B. (2004). Mass imprisonment and the life course: race and class inequality in U.S. incarceration. American Sociological Review, 69/2, 151-168.
Kupchik, Aaron. 2010. Homeroom Security: School discipline in an age of fear. NY: NYU Press.
Mason, Jeff. 2012. “Obama skeptical of NRA proposal to put more guns in schools.” Reuters, December 30.
Mukherjee, Elora. 2007. Criminalizing the Classroom: The over-policing of New York City schools. NY: New York Civil Liberties Union
US Department of Education Office of Civil Rights (2008). 2006 Data Collection.
RESOLUTION 5: Expression of Gratitude
Our sincere appreciation is expressed to all of the officers, committee chairs, and members who have made this program possible and whose efforts maintain the vitality of the SSSP. First, we thank President R.A. Dello Buono for his outstanding leadership in developing the 63rd Annual Meeting and its theme: Re-imagining Social Problems: Moving Beyond Social Constructionism. We also thank this year’s Program Committee: Chair David Fasenfest and committee members Kum-Kum Bhavnani, Jeneve Brooks, Melanie E.L. Bush, Rodney D. Coates, Walda Katz-Fishman, Mary Romero, and George Sanders; and Local Arrangements Committee Chair Angie K. Beeman and committee members Carolle Charles, Francesca Degiuli, Rifat A. Salam, Karen Ivette Tejada, and Thomas Volscho. We thank the staff of the Westin New York at Times Square for fine accommodations, and we particularly want to recognize the efforts made by Marcus Timmons, Senior Convention Services Manager, and Jenny Ahn, Account Director.
The Society wishes to express its gratitude to Past President Wendy Simonds for her years of leadership; Vice-President Tracy L. Dietz for managing the resolutions process; Glenn W. Muschert for his service as Secretary; and Susan M. Carlson for her service as Treasurer and Chair of the Ad Hoc Publisher Search Committee. The Society also thanks Anna Maria Santiago, President-Elect; Luis A. Fernandez, Vice-President Elect; Board of Directors: Marlese Durr, Stephani A. Williams, Lara J. Foley, Antwan Jones, Phoebe Morgan, outgoing members Valerie Leiter, Nancy J. Mezey, Patrick K. O’Brien (outgoing) and Sarah Hendricks, student representatives of the Board; Shannon M. Monnat, Chair of the Council of Special Problems Divisions; Becky Pettit, Editor of Social Problems; Brent Teasdale, outgoing Editor of Social Problems Forum: The SSSP Newsletter; Patrick Donnelly, outgoing Budget, Finance, and Audit Committee Chair and committee members: Paul D. Steele, Claire M. Renzetti, and Susan M. Carlson; David A. Smith, Editorial and Publications Committee Chair and committee members: Suzanne Vaughan, Nancy C. Jurik, John F. Galliher, Mary C. Bernstein, Paul C. Luken, Patrick Donnelly, Ted Chiricos, Becky Pettit, and Brent Teasdale; the University of Tennessee and the Department of Sociology for hosting the SSSP Administrative Office; Manhattan College and the Sage journal Critical Sociology for their financial contributions to program activities, and to the University of California Press for its financial contribution to the registration bags.
The Society wishes to thank Executive Officer Héctor L. Delgado, Administrative Officer & Meeting Manager Michele Smith Koontz, Information Technology Specialist Sharon Shumaker, Administrative Assistant Marisa Stone, and Graduate Research Associate & Webmaster Lisa East for continuing to make the organization run and do all that it does year in and year out.
